Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 15:37
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Consumer sentiment swings sharply higher in June as tariff anxiety recedes - Axios
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Caffeine actually rewires your brain while you sleep - Boy Genius Report
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Russia can stop this any time.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Analysts revamp forecast for Nvidia-backed AI stock - TheStreet
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Heart in distress? 9 silent symptoms you shouldn’t overlook - Times of India
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What’s the best local food you’ve ever tried while traveling?
Thank you.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
An Extreme Drop in Oxygen Will Eventually Suffocate Most Life on Earth - ScienceAlert
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Why is that Hag Hillary Clinton so quiet these days? She is the dog that isn't barking
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
How to reduce the age of the heart by 20 years - Times of India